Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://waffo.com/docs/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

​
Overview

In cross-border and local payment operations, post-transaction disputes and fund recovery risks are critical operational challenges for merchants. The Waffo Dispute & Chargeback Management Platform has built a systematic, tiered closed-loop defense system to address this. This system covers three core stages, responding to different phases of risk evolution:

Concept

An early risk signal notification provided by card schemes or third-party networks (e.g., Visa RDR, Mastercard Ethoca) after a cardholder complains to the issuing bank but before the bank formally initiates the chargeback process.

Role & ImportanceThis is the most proactive and cost-effective defense stage. Receiving and acting on alerts means resolving disputes before the bank opens a case, preventing the transaction from escalating into a formal chargeback record. This effectively avoids bank fines and protects the merchant’s chargeback ratio and account health.
The Waffo Platform integrates these three stages into a unified “Risk Sensing - Negotiation Response - Formal Defense” standardized closed loop. Through this system, we help merchants proactively intervene throughout the risk evolution chain, ultimately achieving the core goals of reducing financial loss, minimizing operational leakage, and improving processing efficiency and compliance.

​
Chargeback alert

Providing a golden window for resolution to achieve optimal cost-efficiency before risks solidify into formal cases.

​
Scenario description

When a cardholder questions a credit card transaction and contacts the issuing bank to complain, but the bank has not yet formally initiated the chargeback process, card schemes or third-party networks (e.g., Visa RDR, Mastercard Ethoca) generate alert signals. The transaction is in a non-mandatory negotiation window. Merchants have a golden processing time of 24-72 hours to intervene proactively and prevent the case from being formally established.

​
Core capabilities

​
Merchant value

​
Customer dispute

Effectively clarifying facts through standardized, professional evidence submission during the bank inquiry stage to stop cases from entering fund debit. Request the dispute handling operations manual →

​
Scenario description

The issuing bank or payment channel has formally initiated an information inquiry process, requiring the merchant to provide transaction vouchers to verify authenticity. This stage typically manifests as a “Retrieval Request” or “Request for Information (RFI).” Funds have not yet been debited, but the merchant must provide sufficient evidence within the specified timeframe, otherwise, the case may escalate to a formal chargeback.

​
Core capabilities

​
Merchant value

​
Chargeback

Providing professional, efficient, full-process defense support to fully recover debited funds when cases enter the final adjudication stage. Request the chargeback handling operations manual → Waffo Chargeback Management API: View Documentation →

​
Scenario description

The issuing bank or payment channel has formally initiated the chargeback process. Funds have been debited from the merchant account. The merchant must submit a formal defense (Representment) within the specified timeframe, providing complete evidence to request the card scheme to adjudicate and reverse the debit.

​
Core capabilities

​
Merchant value

​
Frequently asked questions

What is the fundamental difference between Alerts, Disputes, and Chargebacks?

  • Alert: A “Pre-emptive Opportunity.” The bank has not opened a formal case. The goal is “Case Elimination.”
  • Dispute: A “Mid-stream Negotiation.” The bank has opened an inquiry. The goal is “Provide Evidence, Persuade Closure.”
  • Chargeback: A “Post-event Adjudication.” The bank has debited funds. The goal is “Submit Defense, Recover Funds.”
This is mainly due to two reasons:
  • Not all issuing banks support the Alert or Retrieval Request workflow; some banks prefer to initiate a Chargeback directly.
  • Card schemes’ Early Fraud Warning (EFW) systems and Dispute processing systems operate independently. Information may not sync, causing an Alert to arrive later than the Chargeback.
Success depends on the quality and compliance of the evidence. The Waffo platform provides structured checklist guidance based on Reason Codes and advises merchants to ensure evidence is clear, complete, and targeted (e.g., providing proof of delivery with signature, clear proof of transaction authorization) to meet the issuing bank’s review standards. Systematic processes also prevent technical failures due to timeouts or formatting errors.
Generally, no. Once a formal Chargeback process is entered, the handling fee charged by the bank covers administrative costs and is not refunded regardless of the defense outcome. However, if a case proceeds to the Arbitration stage and the merchant wins, the high arbitration fees may potentially be refunded or borne by the losing party.
Need help? Contact support